It’s About Time- In Turkey, a Step to Allow Head Scarves

In Turkey, a Step to Allow Head Scarves

ISTANBUL — Turkey’s governing political party — a class of young, observant Muslim politicians — reached an agreement late Monday to lift a ban on the wearing of head scarves by women attending universities, a move likely to enrage the country’s staunchly secular old guard and clear the way for a more openly religious society.

The party, led by Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, agreed with a smaller nationalist party to amend several articles in the Constitution that they say will provide a guarantee to covered women, who have been barred from higher education since the late 1990s by a court ruling. Some get around the ban by wearing hats and wigs. Mr. Erdogan, whose party, Justice and Development, was re-elected in a landslide vote in July, has made lifting the ban a priority, because a large part of his constituency is observant Muslims, who feel that the state has discriminated against them for too long.

But the agreement, announced in a brief statement shortly before midnight on Monday, sets the stage for a broader fight between Mr. Erdogan, who favors a more religiously observant Turkey, and the entrenched secular old guard — the military and the judiciary, which has steered the state from behind the scenes since it was created in 1923.

The changes will be submitted to Parliament on Tuesday, and though the measure has enough votes to pass, the political party closest to the military, the Republican People’s Party, is likely to challenge it in the courts, which tend to rule in favor of the military.

The military, which has deposed four elected governments since 1960, delivered a sharp rebuke to Mr. Erdogan last spring when he was pressing for the selection of a close ally, an observant Muslim, as president. The military despises Mr. Erdogan because the democratic changes he is making in Turkey are slowly taking away its power.

The head scarf is a deeply emotional issue here, with its ban representing the feeling for religious Turks of being second-class citizens in their own country, and its growing public presence representing a changing society that secular Turks feel is no longer their own.

In a passionate speech to an auditorium full of covered female party members in Istanbul on Sunday, Mr. Erdogan emphasized that being religious did not preclude respecting the secular contours of Turkey’s state, a central charge of the old-guard elite.

“What do they say — only citizens without head scarves can be secular?” he said to the women, in remarks broadcast on Turkish television. “They are making a mistake falling into such segregation. This is a society of those, with and without head scarves, who support a democratic, secular social law state.”

Millions of rural, observant Turks migrated to cities in the 1980s, became middle class in an economic boom, and began to mix with their secular, urban counterparts in malls, parks and, by the late 1990s, universities.

Their continued religiosity contradicts the theory that Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, Turkey’s founder, applied in the 1920s that belief would die away with increased wealth and education.

“I am the walking proof of the failure of their theory,” said Hilal Kaplan, a graduate student in sociology. “I’m an enlightened woman, and I wear the head scarf. It just doesn’t make sense to them.”

The proposal left open the question of whether covered women, who are also barred from working as public servants, would be allowed in other public spheres as well.

An overwhelming majority of Turks support lifting the ban in universities, but support becomes shakier for extending those freedoms to primary schools and high schools.

Ayse Gul Altinay, a professor at Sabanci University who has deliberately included the writings of covered women in her courses so that their voices are heard, says the ban against covered women in universities is “indefensible,” but argues that lifting it for younger students was more problematic.

“It’s different for a child,” she said. In very conservative towns “there’s a very real danger of social pressure.”

But years of blocking what many see as a basic demand has built up frustration. “It had been so inflexible for so long,” Ms. Altinay said. “Unfortunately, we’ve asked for it.”

Mr. Erdogan seemed to indicate as much in his speech to the women of his party.

“This issue has been debated for 40 years and been a struggle for 18 years,” he said. “This issue should be off the agenda.”

Also on Monday, a Turkish court convicted Atilla Yayla, a college professor who is now teaching in England, and sentenced him to 15 months in prison for insulting the memory of Turkey’s founder. The judge suspended the sentence, however, saying it would be applied only if he committed another offense. One of Mr. Yayla’s lawyers said the ruling would be appealed.

Sebnem Arsu contributed reporting.


It’s about time. Ya era hora.

Here’s the link to the NYT article.  turkey headscarf



  1. Adil Cole Said:

    Allahu Akbar, though I don’t know if the secular institutions will allow this to go through. I wonder how that guy insulted Ataturk, I insult him all the time. Guess I wouldn’t be a good Turkish citizen. Read about Ataturk, he crushed many of the Islamic institutions in “Turkey”,and look how he died – Syphullus. What a wretch.Allah knows best, but from the outward appearance of things, may Allah gladly show him his place in the Nar. Allah is “forgetting” him, just as he forgot Allah – ‘Azz wa Jallah.

  2. As-salamu ‘alaykum,

    This is the first time that I’ve visited your blog. I’m very impressed with your content so I plan to link to it from mine.

    As far as events in Turkey…well it has always seemed to me that Attaturk and his minions never really understood what “secularism” really means. The fact that it means that the gov’t should get out of the business of enforcing, spreading or opposing either religion or irreligion (and this is the point they miss!) and let people follow their own creed as their faith dictates seems to be really lost on them.

    Eventually I hope that both sides will eventually realize that a “live and let live” agreement is what will be best for both sides, with neither side trying to force their ways on the other. That’s what everyone on both sides fear, but so far only the “secular fundamentalists” are the ones forcing their ways on practicing Muslims!

    Keep up the good work!

  3. TheAngryMuslimah Said:


    Very informative info……nice blog……I will be back to read more

{ RSS feed for comments on this post} · { TrackBack URI }

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: